Greetings from a university group coordinating three small labs. We’ll be collecting CK in synchronized windows and need results to align across sites. The big asks: one harmonized method, strict QC, reference materials for calibration, and the same reporting format. Budget is limited, but we’ll pay for steadiness and clear communication. If a provider offers guidance on cross-site validation or split-sample checks, that would be perfect. What partners have actually delivered that level of stability?
top of page
For at se dette fungerer skal du gå til din udgivne hjemmeside.
Best path to validate CK data across study sites
Best path to validate CK data across study sites
2 kommentarer
Synes godt om
2 kommentarer
Det er ikke længere muligt at kommentere på dette indlæg. Kontakt hjemmesideejeren for at få flere oplysninger.
bottom of page
Adding a neutral note as someone planning a smaller collaboration. Cross-site drift has bitten our team before, so the ideas about a pilot, duplicate samples, and control data resonate. A single reporting template sounds minor, yet it saves hours when merging spreadsheets. Will incorporate these pointers into our protocol draft and compare vendors on how willing they are to share QC summaries. This conversation is a handy checklist while we align partners.